OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

FLUX.1 Schnell vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

FLUX.1 Schnell vs Google: Gemma 4 31B: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

FLUX.1 Schnell has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Google: Gemma 4 31B has more provider fallback routes, while Google: Gemma 4 31B has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

selected routeFLUX.1 Schnell cheapest route

$0.4642/1MGoogle: Gemma 4 31B cheapest route

not enough dataFLUX.1 Schnell fastest measured p50 TTFT

1359 msGoogle: Gemma 4 31B fastest measured p50 TTFT via tinfoil

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

FLUX.1 SchnellGoogle: Gemma 4 31B

Model idblack-forest-labs/flux.1-schnellgoogle/gemma-4-31b-it

Publisher Nscale Google AI Studio

AI IQ — IQ 103#80

Context0 tokens262,144 tokens

Credits provider routes114

Cheapest routeselected route$0.4642/1M

Cached inputNot published$0.03798/1M to $0.211/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas provider E2EE route

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data1359 ms via tinfoil

Highest measured throughputnot enough data271 tok/s via lightning

Recent route uptime rangenot enough data0.00% to 100.00%

Modes chat

FLUX.1 Schnell routes

Overview1 Credits routes

Google: Gemma 4 31B routes

Overview14 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.242 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.340 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash40 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B38 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K338 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b36 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.634 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B31 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="black-forest-labs/flux.1-schnell",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, FLUX.1 Schnell or Google: Gemma 4 31B?

Is FLUX.1 Schnell or Google: Gemma 4 31B cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is selected route for FLUX.1 Schnell and $0.4642/1M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is FLUX.1 Schnell or Google: Gemma 4 31B faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for FLUX.1 Schnell and 1359 ms for Google: Gemma 4 31B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test FLUX.1 Schnell and Google: Gemma 4 31B with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between black-forest-labs/flux.1-schnell and google/gemma-4-31b-it. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.