OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status
DeepSeek: R1 0528 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash
Compare DeepSeek: R1 0528 and Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash by providers, context, price, and TrustedRouter route support.
Onebase URL to migrate
100sof models and routes
0prompt or output logs. Always.
Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.
Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.
Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.
Practical read
DeepSeek: R1 0528 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash has more provider fallback routes, while Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash with the lower p50 TTFT.
$2.7825/1MDeepSeek: R1 0528 cheapest route
$11.025/1MGoogle: Gemini 3.5 Flash cheapest route
2206 msDeepSeek: R1 0528 measured p50 TTFT
1882 msGoogle: Gemini 3.5 Flash measured p50 TTFT
DeepSeek: R1 0528Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash
Model id
deepseek/deepseek-r1-0528google/gemini-3.5-flash
PublisherDeepSeekGoogle AI Studio
Context163,840 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Provider routes57
Cheapest route$2.7825/1M$11.025/1M
Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas ZDR route
Modes
chat
chat
DeepSeek: R1 0528 routes
Production choice
Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.
TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.
OpenAI clientPython
client = OpenAI(
base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="deepseek/deepseek-r1-0528",
messages=messages,
)