OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway
Onebase URL to migrate
100sof models and routes
0prompt or output logs. Always.
Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.
Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.
Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

DeepSeek V3.1 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. DeepSeek V3.1 has more provider fallback routes, while Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show DeepSeek V3.1 with the lower p50 TTFT.

$1.266/1MDeepSeek V3.1 cheapest route
$14.77/1MGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview cheapest route
3875 msDeepSeek V3.1 fastest measured p50 TTFT via sambanova
3943 msGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview fastest measured p50 TTFT via google-vertex

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

DeepSeek V3.1Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v3.1google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Context131,072 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Credits provider routes54
Cheapest route$1.266/1M$14.77/1M
Cached input$0.13715/1M to $0.142425/1M$0.211/1M to $0.422/1M
Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas ZDR route
Fastest measured p50 TTFT3875 ms via sambanova3943 ms via google-vertex
Highest measured throughputnot enough data41 tok/s via lightning
Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%
Modes chat chat

DeepSeek V3.1 routes

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison
Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython
client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v3.1",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek V3.1 or Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

DeepSeek V3.1 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. DeepSeek V3.1 has more provider fallback routes, while Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show DeepSeek V3.1 with the lower p50 TTFT.

Is DeepSeek V3.1 or Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $1.266/1M for DeepSeek V3.1 and $14.77/1M for Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek V3.1 or Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 3875 ms for DeepSeek V3.1 and 3943 ms for Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek V3.1 and Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-v3.1 and google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.

Workspace access

Sign in

Choose a sign in method to access your TrustedRouter workspace.

By signing in you agree to the terms of service and privacy policy.