OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B on Fireworks

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B on Fireworks: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

DeepSeek V3.1 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. DeepSeek V3.1 has more provider fallback routes, while DeepSeek V3.1 has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

$1.266/1MDeepSeek V3.1 cheapest route

$1.5825/1MMuse Glimmer 30B on Fireworks cheapest route

3875 msDeepSeek V3.1 fastest measured p50 TTFT via sambanova

not enough dataMuse Glimmer 30B on Fireworks fastest measured p50 TTFT

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

DeepSeek V3.1Muse Glimmer 30B on Fireworks

Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v3.1meta-models/muse-glimmer-30b

Publisher DeepSeek Fireworks AI

AI IQ IQ 95#105 —

Context131,072 tokens131,072 tokens

Credits provider routes53

Cheapest route$1.266/1M$1.5825/1M

Cached input$0.13715/1M to $0.142425/1M$0.0422/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas ZDR route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT3875 ms via sambanovanot enough data

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%not enough data

Modes chat chat

DeepSeek V3.1 routes

Overview5 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Muse Glimmer 30B on Fireworks routes

Overview3 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.233 combined provider routes
DeepSeek V3.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.332 combined provider routes
DeepSeek V3.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash31 combined provider routes
Muse Glimmer 30B on Fireworks vs Z.ai: GLM 5.231 combined provider routes
Muse Glimmer 30B on Fireworks vs Z.ai: GLM 5.330 combined provider routes
DeepSeek V3.1 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 073129 combined provider routes
DeepSeek V3.1 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K329 combined provider routes
Muse Glimmer 30B on Fireworks vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash29 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v3.1",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek V3.1 or Muse Glimmer 30B on Fireworks?

Is DeepSeek V3.1 or Muse Glimmer 30B on Fireworks cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $1.266/1M for DeepSeek V3.1 and $1.5825/1M for Muse Glimmer 30B on Fireworks. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek V3.1 or Muse Glimmer 30B on Fireworks faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 3875 ms for DeepSeek V3.1 and not enough data for Muse Glimmer 30B on Fireworks. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek V3.1 and Muse Glimmer 30B on Fireworks with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-v3.1 and meta-models/muse-glimmer-30b. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.