Find a model

Browse the full catalog →

Free to start

DeepSeek v4.1 Flash (1017) vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code

Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes DeepSeek v4.1 Flash (1017) and Kimi K2.7 Code. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.
Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.
Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

DeepSeek v4.1 Flash (1017) has the lower published input-plus-output rate, the larger context window and the lower measured p50 time to first token. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code has more Credits provider routes.

$1.5825/1MDeepSeek v4.1 Flash (1017) cheapest route
$4.173791/1MMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code cheapest route
1084 msDeepSeek v4.1 Flash (1017) fastest measured p50 TTFT via venice
1583 msMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code fastest measured p50 TTFT via wandb

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

DeepSeek v4.1 Flash (1017)MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code
Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code
AI IQ — IQ 111#77
Context1,000,000 tokens262,144 tokens
Credits provider routes114
Cheapest route$1.5825/1M$4.173791/1M
Cached input$0.01/1M$0.15825/1M to $0.546617/1M
Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas ZDR route
Fastest measured p50 TTFT1084 ms via venice1583 ms via wandb
Highest measured throughputnot enough data167 tok/s via lyceum
Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%
Modes chat chat

DeepSeek v4.1 Flash (1017) routes

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison
Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython
client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek v4.1 Flash (1017) or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code?

DeepSeek v4.1 Flash (1017) has the lower published input-plus-output rate, the larger context window and the lower measured p50 time to first token. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code has more Credits provider routes.

Is DeepSeek v4.1 Flash (1017) or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $1.5825/1M for DeepSeek v4.1 Flash (1017) and $4.173791/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek v4.1 Flash (1017) or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1084 ms for DeepSeek v4.1 Flash (1017) and 1583 ms for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek v4.1 Flash (1017) and MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017 and moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.

Workspace access

Sign in

Choose a sign in method to access your TrustedRouter workspace.

New to TrustedRouter?

By continuing you agree to the terms of service and privacy policy.