OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status
LLM Provider Latency Benchmarks
Measured time-to-first-token, time-to-first-byte, throughput, and success rate for LLM providers routed through TrustedRouter.
Onebase URL to migrate
100sof models and routes
0prompt or output logs. Always.
Measured provider latency
Provider speed data from real routed requests.
TrustedRouter publishes metadata-only measurements for time-to-first-token, time-to-first-byte, throughput, uptime, and excluded probe-configuration rows. The goal is to show what the router actually sees, not what a provider claims in a launch post.
- ✓ Provider and model leaderboards
- ✓ Per-provider performance pages when enough samples exist
- ✓ Per-model performance pages when enough samples exist
- ✓ Prompt and output content never stored for these rollups
Signalsmetadata only
{
"provider": "tinfoil",
"model": "moonshotai/kimi-k2.6",
"p50_ttft_ms": 1192,
"uptime": 0.999,
"sample_count": 42
}Provider pages
- Tinfoil performanceConfidential and E2EE route samples
- Anthropic performanceClaude route samples
- Google Vertex performanceManaged Google Cloud route samples
- Google AI Studio performanceGemini Developer API route samples
Model pages
- Kimi K2.6 performanceProvider-specific route metrics
- Gemini Flash performanceFast multimodal route metrics
- GPT Nano performanceSmall-model latency metrics
Questions
Are these vendor claims?
No. The leaderboard is generated from TrustedRouter synthetic probes and runtime metadata, not provider marketing claims.
Do latency probes store prompts or outputs?
No. Status and leaderboard records store provider, model, latency, token, route, cost, and outcome metadata only.