OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs gpt-oss-120b: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway
Onebase URL to migrate
100sof models and routes
0prompt or output logs. Always.
Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.
Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.
Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has more provider fallback routes, while inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

$0.2532/1MinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL cheapest route
$0.211/1MOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b cheapest route
not enough datainclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL fastest measured p50 TTFT
626 msOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b fastest measured p50 TTFT via fireworks

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VLOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b
Model idinclusionai/ling-3.0-flash-vlopenai/gpt-oss-120b
AI IQ IQ 98#99
Context131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Credits provider routes122
Cheapest route$0.2532/1M$0.211/1M
Cached input$0.01266/1M$0.015825/1M to $0.1055/1M
Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas provider E2EE route
Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data626 ms via fireworks
Highest measured throughputnot enough data290 tok/s via cerebras
Recent route uptime rangenot enough data100.00%
Modes chat chat

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL routes

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison
Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython
client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="inclusionai/ling-3.0-flash-vl",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL or OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b?

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has more provider fallback routes, while inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

Is inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL or OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.2532/1M for inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL and $0.211/1M for OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL or OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL and 626 ms for OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL and OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between inclusionai/ling-3.0-flash-vl and openai/gpt-oss-120b. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.

Workspace access

Sign in

Choose a sign in method to access your TrustedRouter workspace.

By signing in you agree to the terms of service and privacy policy.