OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

moonshotai/Kimi: K2.7-Code-Highspeed vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b

moonshotai/Kimi: K2.7-Code-Highspeed vs gpt-oss-120b: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway
Onebase URL to migrate
100sof models and routes
0prompt or output logs. Always.
Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.
Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.
Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has more provider fallback routes, while moonshotai/Kimi: K2.7-Code-Highspeed has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b with the lower p50 TTFT.

$10.4445/1Mmoonshotai/Kimi: K2.7-Code-Highspeed cheapest route
$0.211/1MOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b cheapest route
3883 msmoonshotai/Kimi: K2.7-Code-Highspeed fastest measured p50 TTFT via kimi
1425 msOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b fastest measured p50 TTFT via mancer

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

moonshotai/Kimi: K2.7-Code-HighspeedOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b
Model idmoonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code-highspeedopenai/gpt-oss-120b
AI IQ IQ 98#99
Context262,144 tokens131,072 tokens
Credits provider routes122
Cheapest route$10.4445/1M$0.211/1M
Cached input$0.4009/1M$0.015825/1M to $0.1055/1M
Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas provider E2EE route
Fastest measured p50 TTFT3883 ms via kimi1425 ms via mancer
Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data
Recent route uptime range100.00%80.00% to 100.00%
Modes chat chat

moonshotai/Kimi: K2.7-Code-Highspeed routes

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison
Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython
client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code-highspeed",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, moonshotai/Kimi: K2.7-Code-Highspeed or OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b?

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has more provider fallback routes, while moonshotai/Kimi: K2.7-Code-Highspeed has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b with the lower p50 TTFT.

Is moonshotai/Kimi: K2.7-Code-Highspeed or OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $10.4445/1M for moonshotai/Kimi: K2.7-Code-Highspeed and $0.211/1M for OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is moonshotai/Kimi: K2.7-Code-Highspeed or OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 3883 ms for moonshotai/Kimi: K2.7-Code-Highspeed and 1425 ms for OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test moonshotai/Kimi: K2.7-Code-Highspeed and OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code-highspeed and openai/gpt-oss-120b. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.

Workspace access

Sign in

Choose a sign in method to access your TrustedRouter workspace.

By signing in you agree to the terms of service and privacy policy.