OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Tencent: Hy3 vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

Tencent: Hy3 vs MiMo-V2.5: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 has more provider fallback routes, while Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show Tencent: Hy3 with the lower p50 TTFT.

$0.6963/1MTencent: Hy3 cheapest route

$0.4431/1MXiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 cheapest route

2871 msTencent: Hy3 fastest measured p50 TTFT via siliconflow

3606 msXiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 fastest measured p50 TTFT via xiaomi

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Tencent: Hy3Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

Model idtencent/hy3xiaomi/mimo-v2.5

Publisher DeepInfra Xiaomi MiMo

AI IQ IQ 100#90 IQ 108#67

Context262,144 tokens1,050,000 tokens

Credits provider routes45

Cheapest route$0.6963/1M$0.4431/1M

Cached input$0.034815/1M to $0.05275/1M$0.01/1M to $0.10645/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture variesprovider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT2871 ms via siliconflow3606 ms via xiaomi

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%90.00% to 100.00%

Modes chat chat

Tencent: Hy3 routes

Overview4 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 routes

Overview5 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.233 combined provider routes
Tencent: Hy3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.232 combined provider routes
Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.332 combined provider routes
Tencent: Hy3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.331 combined provider routes
Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash31 combined provider routes
Tencent: Hy3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash30 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.529 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.529 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="tencent/hy3",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Tencent: Hy3 or Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5?

Is Tencent: Hy3 or Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.6963/1M for Tencent: Hy3 and $0.4431/1M for Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Tencent: Hy3 or Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 2871 ms for Tencent: Hy3 and 3606 ms for Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Tencent: Hy3 and Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between tencent/hy3 and xiaomi/mimo-v2.5. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.