OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.1

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.1: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has more provider fallback routes, while Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

$2.2999/1MZ.ai: GLM 5.2 cheapest route

$6.119/1MGLM 5.1 cheapest route

594 msZ.ai: GLM 5.2 fastest measured p50 TTFT via together

not enough dataGLM 5.1 fastest measured p50 TTFT

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Z.ai: GLM 5.2GLM 5.1

Model idz-ai/glm-5.2zai-org/GLM-5.1

Publisher Z.AI Nebius Token Factory

AI IQ IQ 120#28 IQ 113#49

Context1,048,576 tokens204,800 tokens

Credits provider routes281

Cheapest route$2.2999/1M$6.119/1M

Cached input$0.110775/1M to $1.0339/1MNot published

Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routehas ZDR route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT594 ms via togethernot enough data

Highest measured throughput138 tok/s via parasailnot enough data

Recent route uptime range85.71% to 100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 routes

Overview28 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

GLM 5.1 routes

Overview1 Credits routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.354 combined provider routes
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash54 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.252 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.252 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.250 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.248 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.245 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.244 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="z-ai/glm-5.2",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Z.ai: GLM 5.2 or GLM 5.1?

Is Z.ai: GLM 5.2 or GLM 5.1 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $2.2999/1M for Z.ai: GLM 5.2 and $6.119/1M for GLM 5.1. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Z.ai: GLM 5.2 or GLM 5.1 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 594 ms for Z.ai: GLM 5.2 and not enough data for GLM 5.1. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Z.ai: GLM 5.2 and GLM 5.1 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between z-ai/glm-5.2 and zai-org/GLM-5.1. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.