OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

euryale:33-70b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3

euryale:33-70b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

euryale:33-70b has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Z.ai: GLM 5.3 has more provider fallback routes, while Z.ai: GLM 5.3 has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show Z.ai: GLM 5.3 with the lower p50 TTFT.

$1.477/1Meuryale:33-70b cheapest route

$4.2833/1MZ.ai: GLM 5.3 cheapest route

1814 mseuryale:33-70b fastest measured p50 TTFT via nextbit

1417 msZ.ai: GLM 5.3 fastest measured p50 TTFT via akashml

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

euryale:33-70bZ.ai: GLM 5.3

Model idsao10k/l3.3-70b-euryale-v2.3z-ai/glm-5.3

Publisher NextBit Z.AI

AI IQ — IQ 123#18

Context131,072 tokens1,048,576 tokens

Credits provider routes126

Cheapest route$1.477/1M$4.2833/1M

Cached inputNot published$0.1477/1M to $1.02546/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas provider E2EE route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT1814 ms via nextbit1417 ms via akashml

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range75.00%0.00% to 100.00%

Modes chat chat

euryale:33-70b routes

Overview1 Credits routes

Z.ai: GLM 5.3 routes

Overview26 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.354 combined provider routes
Z.ai: GLM 5.3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash52 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.350 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.350 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.348 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.346 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.343 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.342 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="sao10k/l3.3-70b-euryale-v2.3",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, euryale:33-70b or Z.ai: GLM 5.3?

Is euryale:33-70b or Z.ai: GLM 5.3 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $1.477/1M for euryale:33-70b and $4.2833/1M for Z.ai: GLM 5.3. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is euryale:33-70b or Z.ai: GLM 5.3 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1814 ms for euryale:33-70b and 1417 ms for Z.ai: GLM 5.3. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test euryale:33-70b and Z.ai: GLM 5.3 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between sao10k/l3.3-70b-euryale-v2.3 and z-ai/glm-5.3. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.